Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT-$359
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 155
2-Core 294
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 850
86% 700 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 104
Parallax 127
98% 117 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 113
Splatting 104
96% 119 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 263 234 205 232 218 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 498
Write 316
Mixed 279
SusWrite 243
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 40.1
150% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 171
136% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
311GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 138 126 129 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63% Good
Read 93
Write 92.2
Mixed 74
SusWrite 127
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
526GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 157 169 171 170 171 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 129
Write 128
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 164
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 27
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 26.5
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 HPN3678 HP X27i
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $911
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback