Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 21 '21 at 08:40
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 67.1
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
91% 173 Pts
4-Core 548
8-Core 952
91% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,429
88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 230F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.6% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 65.2
34% 53.9 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 41.8
39% 49.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 269 263 260 248 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 478
Write 293
Mixed 272
SusWrite 262
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 37.8
80% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 172
136% 190 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
536GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 52 52 54 54 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 29.6
Write 65
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 51.8
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
124% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
225GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 93 94 88 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 84.1
Write 111
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 92.3
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 141 169 171 174 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 162
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 164
93% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 24.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 24
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 7R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 50% 28 288 221 60 27.9" 2560 1440 BNQ7949 BenQ EL2870U
History: Score 29: 2R 4G 7B | Score 56: 7R 7G 0B
Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,260
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback