Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '22 at 18:00
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 133
2-Core 260
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 1001
90% 757 Pts
64-Core 1,310
81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Asus(1043 0276) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 3.7
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 7.2
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN1ZABHA 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 420 422 422 422 423 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 422
Mixed 353
SusWrite 421
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 43.3
150% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 254
219% 323 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: JB2OA3K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 102 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.4
Write 92.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 100
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 74%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB
698GB free
Firmware: JB2OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 75 76 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 42.1
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 84.4
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD F4-3200C16-8GTZR M378A1K43CB2-CTD F4-3200C16-8GTZR 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 25.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback