MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 60.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 608
59% 485 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 60.9
35% 51.4 fps
MRender 61.4
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 62.1
51% 62.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 206 223 246 220 202 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 366
Write 318
Mixed 218
SusWrite 232
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 23.4
70% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 222
202% 308 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 111%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 237GB
117GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 130 82 70 133 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37% Below average
Read 342
Write 186
Mixed 213
SusWrite 97.4
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 11.3
44% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 35.2
41% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37%
Great: 100%
RevuAhn_850X1_128GB 128GB
50GB free
Firmware: N0530C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 0 3.9 0 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 382
Write 261
Mixed 248
SusWrite 15.9
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 19.8
68% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 157
150% 236 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
784GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 155 152 154 155 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 111
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 152
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.2 2.5 2.4 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.74% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 11
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 2.9
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.74%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2G43AB3-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
71.1% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 29.4
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 18.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $683
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback