MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$284
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 82.7
83% 82.7 Pts
Poor: 78% Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 196
Parallax 122
98% 146 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 150
Splatting 106
100% 124 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 99%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2975 3094 3163 2664 1521 1510 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS275 240GB
84GB free
Firmware: CS21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 281 282 282 283 281 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 322
Write 278
Mixed 235
SusWrite 281
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 7.4
22% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 95%
Sabrent Rocket 4 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3771 3838 3845 3853 3847 3856 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 206 205 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 170
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 204
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.9
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 40.9
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback