Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 18 '22 at 14:55
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 813
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.4% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 112
Parallax 112
93% 113 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 102
Splatting 95.6
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 166 46 96 148 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 510
Write 24.1
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 141
39% 182 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 11.4
68% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 31.4
32% 54 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
341GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 93 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 84.4
Write 91.1
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 91.3
64% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 4,655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $639
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback