Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 684
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560 XT
Sapphire(1DA2 A396) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1073 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42% Average
Lighting 53.2
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 69.5
43% 58.6 fps
MRender 54.8
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 37.7
40% 49.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42%
Great: 42%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
EXRAM 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 417 131 238 165 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 404
Write 403
Mixed 334
SusWrite 255
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 25.4
105% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 168
137% 189 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.18428S.007 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback