Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '20 at 14:25
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 308
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 589
8-Core 1,001
97% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1276 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 86.1
55% 73.1 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 54.3
51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1565 1687 1089 877 1092 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,774
Write 1,795
Mixed 137
SusWrite 1,293
279% 1,250 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 74.5
245% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 60.5
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 83.3
70% 99.2 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 231%
Great: 311%
SSD PLUS 480GB
327GB free
Firmware: Z310
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 388 284 282 281 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 380
Write 379
Mixed 257
SusWrite 326
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 18
71% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 20.9
26% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
653GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 458 456 456 456 458 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 505
Write 461
Mixed 452
SusWrite 456
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 19.4
104% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 22.6
28% 45.6 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
319GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 458 457 456 446 404 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
69% Good
Read 411
Write 377
Mixed 352
SusWrite 446
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 19.2
74% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 22.6
28% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 69%
Great: 129%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
764GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1299 1308 1306 1319 1320 1321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 653
Write 793
Mixed 101
SusWrite 1,312
162% 715 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 12.4
42% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 20.3
27% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 122%
Great: 311%
Intenso Sata III 480GB
245GB free
Firmware: P051
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 368 368 96 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 371
Write 313
Mixed 310
SusWrite 222
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 16
67% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 11.2
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 20
25% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 101%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 171 172 173 171 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 144
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 170
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 187 186 186 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 172
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 187
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
460% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 104%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 178 181 180 180 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 147
Write 52.7
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 178
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
180% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 148 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 133
Write 130
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 145 146 144 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 34
SusWrite 144
77% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 36.6
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 93%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,486
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback