Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '19 at 17:16
Run Duration	439 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 74.9 1-Core 154 2-Core 303 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 556 8-Core 828 86% 692 Pts	64-Core 1,028 64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 92%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid KINGSTON SH103S3 120GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 110GB free Firmware: 526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 167 166 166 165 166 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 319 Write 196 Mixed 221 SusWrite 168 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 7.5 25% 7.73 MB/s	DQ Read 69.7 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 78.9 70% 101 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 59%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB 32,020 User benchmarks, average bench 230% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1865 949 951 755 820 952 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,473 Write 2,478 Mixed 1313 SusWrite 1,048 357% 1,578 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 69.2 166% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,104 DQ Write 847 DQ Mixed 1,020 750% 990 MB/s
Poor: 150% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 298%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 860 500GB 227 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 355GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 321 321 319 319 321 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 464 Write 414 Mixed 427 SusWrite 335 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 32 104% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 86.8 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 105 88% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 98%
Amd-raid KINGSTON SA400S3 480GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 443GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 184 191 192 200 200 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 388 Write 239 Mixed 318 SusWrite 216 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 23.2 84% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 72.4 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 80.8 75% 111 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 69%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 250GB 184 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 113GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 318 319 318 317 317 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 455 Write 412 Mixed 355 SusWrite 329 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 32.2 111% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 90.4 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 107 90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 177 184 184 184 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 194 Write 164 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 179 110% 151 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 156 156 159 160 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 133 Write 158 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 155 87% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 0.8 276% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.2% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 28.8 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 27.2 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,857 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $194

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $206Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,309x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $115Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	873x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $189Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	838x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	572x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	517x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	406x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	343x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	274x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	142x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,034

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16