Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory60 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 22:16
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 77.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 841
88% 705 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus Radeon RX 5700 XT
Asus(1043 04E2) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 33
Parallax 247
8% 96.5 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 143
81% 93.7 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 103%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 327 330 325 329 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,527
Write 1,471
Mixed 1090
SusWrite 353
300% 1360 MB/s
4K Read 68.6
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 93.5
328% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 1,149
DQ Mixed 1,011
775% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 271%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
858GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 803 773 843 843 845 707 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
229GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 870 874 869 853 849 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,620
Write 1,636
Mixed 1,758
SusWrite 899
385% 1,728 MB/s
4K Read 71.3
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 97.7
328% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,385
DQ Write 1,308
DQ Mixed 1,326
1,001% 1,340 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 321%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 32.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 33.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,836 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback