Today's hottest deals

Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive475% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory248.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration349 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
SP3, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 285
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,109
98% 834 Pts
64-Core 5,441
337% 5,441 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 188
Parallax 179
138% 179 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 180
Splatting 125
118% 147 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 999GB
751GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1793 1632 2894 5702 5947 2040 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
475% Outstanding
Read 3,608
Write 6,654
Mixed 3,469
SusWrite 3,335
967% 4,267 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 65.7
247% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,107
849% 1,147 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 475%
Great: 411%
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 330 385 385 387 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 402
Write 380
Mixed 378
SusWrite 376
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 43.7
123% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 224
162% 209 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 208%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4131 4754 4780 4789 4408 1465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 3,016
Write 4,772
Mixed 2,711
SusWrite 4,055
825% 3,638 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 69.1
240% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 1,287
DQ Mixed 1,207
898% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 494%
Great: 494%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
20GB free
Firmware: 0401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 70 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 87.4
Write 24.1
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 67.5
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
38GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 104 107 107 108 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 95.6
Write 67.8
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 106
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST18000NM000J-2TV103 18TB
17TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 225 263 264 263 263 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 33%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
28GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 97 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 94
Write 75
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 97.8
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-4000C18-32GTRS 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
239% Outstanding
MC Read 102
MC Write 71.1
MC Mixed 122
281% 98.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 40.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 239%
Great: 196%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 319%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $1,520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback