Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 212% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 254% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210610
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '22 at 20:30
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$416 33,026 User benchmarks, average bench 100% AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 87 1-Core 164 2-Core 334 104% 195 Pts	4-Core 669 8-Core 1,326 118% 998 Pts	64-Core 2,732 169% 2,732 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660 155,335 User benchmarks, average bench 204% Gigabyte(1458 4087) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	204% Outstanding	Lighting 295 Reflection 288 Parallax 308 241% 297 fps	MRender 348 Gravity 253 Splatting 189 207% 263 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 225%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 828GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2077 2089 2091 2088 2082 2072 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	343% Outstanding	Read 2,907 Write 2,051 Mixed 976 SusWrite 2,083 447% 2,004 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 42.9 153% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,197 DQ Write 1195 DQ Mixed 871 744% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 343% Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 930GB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5180 5189 5196 5202 5190 2778 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	570% Outstanding	Read 3,497 Write 5,016 Mixed 2,854 SusWrite 4,789 915% 4,039 MB/s	4K Read 56.2 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 79.4 278% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 1,218 DQ Write 1,102 DQ Mixed 1,167 873% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 570% Great: 413%
Intel SSDSC2KB019T8 2TB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 882GB free (System drive) Firmware: XCV10132 SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 393 398 418 388 402 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 272 Write 346 Mixed 327 SusWrite 397 76% 336 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 22 73% 26.9 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 179 141% 196 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 95%
Intel SSDSC2KB019T8 2TB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: XCV10132 SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 426 426 429 429 429 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 332 Write 415 Mixed 340 SusWrite 428 86% 379 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 81.3 4K Mixed 34.7 123% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 211 157% 208 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 95%
Samsung MZQLB960 960GB 894GB free Firmware: EDA5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1266 1264 1270 1266 1268 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 105GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 125 126 125 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 105GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 122 123 125 123 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 248 Write 232 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 122 125% 171 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.8 228% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 135%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 105GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 123 126 127 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 105GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 130 130 130 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 99.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 128 70% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 135%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 642 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	128% Outstanding	MC Read 69 MC Write 38.1 MC Mixed 38.4 139% 48.5 GB/s	SC Read 29.1 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 38 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,143x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	915x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	881x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	700x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16